ANTIBACTERIAL handwash is no more effective than soap at killing germs, a study suggests. Cold water also leaves hands just as clean as hot water. Experts say people should just take care to scrub … ...

Expensive liquid antibacterial handwash is no more effective than plain soap at killing bacteria, a new study found. In recent years numerous products have appeared on the shelves boasting they ...

ANTIBACTERIAL handwash is no more effective than soap at killing germs, a study suggests. Cold water also leaves hands just as clean as hot water. Experts say people should just take care to scrub … ...

BUYING antibacterial handwash is a waste of money and may cause you harm, say experts. Soap and water can be more effective at stopping germs. Yet shoppers spent £87million on handwash last year ...

In Korea University, researchers tested the germ cleaning effectiveness of triclosan against non-antibacterial soaps. A solution of 0.3 percent triclosan, the legally maximum allowed concentration ...

What could be better than antibacterial handwash that kills 99.9% of bacteria? Well, ordinary soap, says the FDA in America, which is banning the sale of certain soaps (bars, gels and liquids ...

When all these facts first began to surface, some manufacturers continued to defend their antibacterial products as effective and necessary. To its credit, PZ Cussons, manufacturers of Carex, has ...

Lidl Antibacterial Hand Wash. Lidl Antibacterial Hand Wash costs 75p for 500ml, which works out to 15p per 100ml. I found this soap a little thin, like it's been watered down.

Antibacterial handwash is no more effective than plain soap at killing bacteria, a new study has found. In recent years numerous products have appeared on the shelves claiming they were effective ...

EXPENSIVE liquid antibacterial handwash is no more effective than plain soap at killing bacteria, a new study found. By Natalie Chalk. 00:00, Wed, Sep 16, 2015 | UPDATED: 12:57, Wed, Sep 16, 2015.